La Guemara. Le Talmud de Babylone. Sanhédrin. Tome 2. [Collectif] on Amazon. com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. pages. in8. broché. Un vol. Get this from a library! La Guemara. [1]. 1, Chabbat, [I-II]. [Élie Munk; Désiré Elbèze;]. , Hebrew, Aramaic, French, Book edition: [Masekhet Betsah] = Traité Beitsa: la Guemara: l’édition classique de Vilna accompagnée de notes explicatives.

Author: Dujin Kigasar
Country: Belarus
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Love
Published (Last): 28 January 2004
Pages: 278
PDF File Size: 18.80 Mb
ePub File Size: 7.8 Mb
ISBN: 913-4-52692-707-5
Downloads: 20523
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Yozshutilar

The Talmud thus comprises two components: In a narrow sense, the word Gemara refers to the mastery and transmission of existing tradition, as opposed to sevarawhich means the deriving of new results by logic. Prooftexts quoted to corroborate or disprove the respective opinions and theories will include:.

Roch Hachana, La Guemara Tome 1

Often imputing a view to an earlier authority as to how he may have answered a question: Talmud Readers by Adolf Behrman. Views Read Edit View history.

The rabbis of the Gemara are referred to as Amoraim sing. Not to be confused with Gamera.

Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. This article needs additional citations for verification. Why does the Mishna use one word rather than another? There is little dialogue. There are two versions of the Gemara. Both activities are represented in the “Gemara” as a lx work. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


The disputants here are termed the makshan questioner, “one who raises a difficulty” and tartzan answerer, “one who puts straight”.

This analysis is aimed at an exhaustive understanding of the Mishna’s full meaning. Talmud Aramaic words and phrases Oral Torah.

Le Talmud de Babylone, Roch Hachana

If they do, why do they differ? The process of deduction required to derive gudmara conclusion from a prooftext is often logically complex and indirect. If a statement is not clear enough, the Gemara seeks to clarify the Mishna’s intention. The Gemara will often ask where in the Torah the Mishnah derives a particular law.

March Learn how and when to remove this template message. The analysis of the Amoraim is generally focused on clarifying the positions, ls and views of the Tannaim. In the Talmud, a sugya is presented as a series of responsive hypotheses and questions — with the Talmudic text as a record of each step in the process of reasoning and derivation. The Gemara and the Mishnah together make up the Talmud.

Exploring the logical principles underlying the Mishnah’s statements, ls showing how different understandings of the Mishnah’s reasons could lead to differences in their practical application. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. The distinctive character of the gemara derives largely from the intricate use of argumentation and debate, described above. Resolving contradictions, perceived or actual, between different statements in the Mishnah, or guemqra the Mishnah and other traditions; e.


Demonstrating how the Mishnah’s rulings or disputes, derive from interpretations of Biblical texts. The term “gemara” for the activity of study is far older than its use as a description of any text: Sometimes ls language changes in the middle of a story.

Gemara – Wikipedia

A sugya will typically comprise a detailed proof-based elaboration of the Mishna. Some of these debates were actually conducted by the Amoraimthough many of them are hypothetically reconstructed by the Talmud’s redactors.

Do certain authorities differ or not? If a statement appears obvious, the Gemara seeks pa logical reason for its necessity. What underlying principle is entailed in a statement of fact or in a specific instance brought as an illustration?

laa Their discussions were written down in a series of books that became the Gemara, which when combined with the Mishnah constituted the Talmud. The Gemara thus takes the form of a dialectical exchange by contrast, the Mishnah states concluded legal opinions — and often differences in opinion between the Tannaim.

In each sugyaeither participant may cite scriptural, Mishnaic and Amoraic proof to build a logical support for their respective opinions.